Initially, I had no plans to buy Pentax 67 135mm F4 Macro lens but could not resist the temptation when I saw it at a bargain price in a very good condition at a used camera gear online marketplace. I actually looked for a 165mm F2.8 lens, which could be a good supplement to my 90mm F2.8, but decided to first try Pentax 67 135mm F4 Macro.
Unfortunately, and, oddly enough, very few technical details can be found about this lens, except for the well-known facts which you can read on the relevant page of PentaxForums.com. Nevertheless, some information regarding its optical implementation can be traced.
It is an implementation of Voigtländer semi-symmetrical Dynar lens formula — modification of Heliar lens which is also a variant of the Cooke triplet design. The Pentax lens is very close to the F3.5 Dynar that was previously renamed Heliar. The Dynar is an ancestor to all modern Heliars.
Close focusing and macro capabilities
Actually, this isn’t a macro lens. It’s developed specifically for close focusing. At the maximum lens extension of 42mm it gives only 0.31× magnification ratio with an exposure factor of about ×1.72.
To achieve 1× magnification the lens should be extended by additional 93mm with full set of extension tubes #1+2+3.
As a result, you get a very long lens with exposure factor ×4 which is equal to the actual lens speed F8. This results in the focusing screen becoming very dark and makes the actual focusing very difficult.
Field of view
The focal length of a Pentax 67 135mm F4 Macro lens with the field of view 36.5° is close to that of the old 150mm F2.8 lens with a field of view 33°. Well, I like to use it for close portraits, as for such an image scale there is no need for extension tubes.
Size and weight
It is a portable, lightweight and very handy lens despite its size comparable to 165mm F2.8 lens but 200g lighter.
The lens has a deeply recessed front element, so it doesn’t actually need a hood. But in certain situations it still may be required. Original clip-on plastic hood PH-SA 67mm costs around $50. A cheap compact metal round hood for $3 can be a good substitute.
It has a 67mm filter thread which works fine with both screw-in and special bayonet mount filters.
The lens has 8 aperture blades, which is typical for most of the Pentax 67 lenses. I rarely stop it down below F16, so I will show several photographs of the aperture opening up to this value.
Image quality and bokeh effect
The lens is very sharp throughout the entire aperture range. The key reason for this has to do with its nearly symmetrical design, thanks to the Heliar optical formula. It helps to almost completely eliminate lateral color, coma, and distortion. And there is one more bonus — it has a very pleasant “Heliar-style” bokeh effect and is sharp even when wide open. I like to use it for close-up portraits.
Well, it is a close focusing lens designed to focus closer than normal lenses, sharp and lightweight with the focal length between standard and portrait lenses. So, it is more convenient for me than a classic portrait focal length, as I do not like to stand too far away from a model when shooting close-ups and use extension tubes. In my opinion, it is an underrated lens in the Pentax 67 lineup of lenses.
Pentax 67 135mm F4 Macro lens data
- Focal length: 135mm
- 35mm equivalent: 70mm
- Aperture: 4 ~ 32 (8 blades)
- Close distance: 75cm
- Magnification: 0.31×
- Picture area: 23×18cm
- Exposure factor: ×1.72 (+0.78EV)
- Effective lens speed: 5.2 ~ 42
- Optical formula: 5 elements, 3 groups
- Field of view: 36.5°/29° (Diagonal/Horizontal)
- Filter: 67mm, screw-in and bayonet
- Hood: Built-in, PH-SA 67mm
- Case: S90-140
- Dimensions: 91.5×95mm
- Weight: 0.65kg
Thanks for reading! I would be very grateful if you point out my possible mistakes, add extra information, or just share your experience. Scroll down to the Leave a reply section and share your thoughts about it. Your opinion is important for me. I enjoy answering your questions as the answers may often benefit many other readers and the process of answering allows me to better piece together my existing knowledge and find ideas to improve my articles.