Pentax 67 Extension tubes & Exposure compensation

All extension tubes are designed to enable a camera lens to focus closer than a lens minimum object distance (MOD) for more magnification. Pentax 67 extension tubes are mounted to the inner bayonet of Pentax 6X7/67/67II cameras and permit automatic diaphragm operation with interchangeable lenses of 45mm — 300mm focal length. This article doesn’t cover usage of Pentax 67 extension tubes for the outer bayonet. They lack automatic diaphragm operation but the mathematics is the same.

Exposure factor

Exposure factor is a value by which shutter speed should be multiplied to get the film properly exposed when doing a macro or close-up shot with the lens extended by extension tubes.

The further the lens moves forward, the greater the distance between lens and film plane, and the less amount of light reaching the film. Therefore exposure must be increased to compensate for the loss of light. This is called “exposure factor”.

To calculate exposure factor (EF) properly you need to know three parameters: focal length (f), lens helicoid extension (He) and total extension tubes length (Te). This is a formula to calculate exposure factor: EF = ( (f + Te + He ) / f )2.

We already know the focal length. The Pentax 67 extension tubes were released as a set of three lengths: #1 — 14mm, #2 — 28mm and #3 — 56mm (see the top image). Thus, we can calculate the extension tubes length by adding together all the required figures depending on the number of extension tubes we are using. Now, all we have to do is to measure the lens helicoid extension.

Lens helicoid extension

How to measure lens helicoid extension with a ruler. Example with Pentax 67 135mm F4 Macro

How to measure lens helicoid extension with a ruler

Most lenses are made in such a way that no exposure compensation is required when you shoot at maximum helicoid extension because the loss of light in such case amounts not more than 0.3EV, which is easily superseded by the exposure latitude of the film. That is why people typically disregard calculating exposure factor, except for some lenses with the minimum focal distance less than 8× of the lens focal length.

However, it should be figured out in macro photography with the use of extension tubes to accurately determine exposure, as the lens is already extended by tubes and additional helicoid extension leads to a sharp increase in exposure factor.

For instance, the maximum helicoid extension of a 90mm F2.8 lens is 22mm, and in the case of 135mm F4 Macro lens it amounts to 42mm, which is equivalent to tubes #1+2. Thus, exposition should be adjusted in such lenses under maximum extension even when they are used without any extension tubes: +0.5EV and +0.8EV respectively.

Well, it is not difficult to measure helicoid extension with a regular ruler. Please take a look at the image detailing how to do it. I’ve used 135mm F4 Macro for example. In the top image, the focus is set to the infinity — red mark at 10mm. In the bottom image, the focus is set to the closest distance — red mark at 52mm. So, the helicoid extension is 42mm.

Pentax 67 extension tubes & Exposure compensation calculator

No we can proceed to calculate exposure factor. I’ve made a simple calculator which facilitates this function for Pentax 67 most popular lenses: 90mm F2.8, 105mm F2.4, 135mm F4 Macro, 150mm F2.8 and 165mm F2.8.

Choose lens:
Pentax 67 Extension tubes:
Helicoid extension: mm
Measured shutter speed: sec

Exposure factor:
Compensated shutter speed:
Magnification:
Effective lens speed:
Picture area:

To carry out calculations you should first select a lens from the list and a combination of extension tubes which you use for your purposes, as well as lens helicoid extension, whose calculation I’ve already described. Exposure factor will be calculated automatically.

You can also specify the shutter speed which you’ve measured with an exposure meter. The appropriate shutter speed will be calculated with regard to an exposure factor.

As a bonus, the calculator provides additional useful data for macro work: magnification, effective lens speed, and picture area.

Life size ratio

There is a rule: to get 1:1 magnification with any lens you need to extend it by its focal length. For example, to get 1:1 with 105mm F2.4 you need to use tubes #1+2+3 (98mm) and helicoid extension by 7mm, for 90mm F2.8 you need tubes #2+3 (84mm) and helicoid extension by 6mm, and for 135mm F4 Macro you need to use tubes #1+2+3 (98mm) and helicoid extension by 37mm. In this case the exposure factor will be x4 that gives +2EV of exposure compensation.

Exposure compensation without extension tubes

Yes, you may need it. But it depends on the lens you use and the helicoid extension. It is better to check this with the calculator. In my experience, if the loss of light is more than 0.3EV you would better to adjust exposure.

Pentax 67 extension tubes magnification chart

Lens #1 #2 #2+1 #3 #3+1 #3+2 #3+2+1
45mm F4 0.31 ~ 0.48 0.62 ~ 0.79 0.93 ~ 1.1 1.24 ~ 1.41 1.56 ~ 1.72 1.87 ~ 2.03 2.18 ~ 2.34
55mm F4 (I) 0.25 ~ 0.45 0.51 ~ 0.71 0.76 ~ 0.96 1.02 ~ 1.22 1.27 ~ 1.47 1.53 ~ 1.73 1.78 ~ 1.98
55mm F4 (II) 0.25 ~ 0.49 0.51 ~ 0.75 0.76 ~ 1.0 1.02 ~ 1.25 1.27 ~ 1.51 1.53 ~ 1.76 1.78 ~ 2.02
90mm F2.8 0.16 ~ 0.36 0.31 ~ 0.51 0.47 ~ 0.67 0.62 ~ 0.82 0.78 ~ 0.98 0.93 ~ 1.13 1.09 ~ 1.29
105mm F2.4 0.13 ~ 0.27 0.27 ~ 0.4 0.4 ~ 0.53 0.53 ~ 0.67 0.67 ~ 0.8 0.8 ~ 0.93 0.93 ~ 1.07
135mm F4 Macro 0.1 ~ 0.41 0.21 ~ 0.52 0.31 ~ 0.62 0.41 ~ 0.73 0.52 ~ 0.83 0.62 ~ 0.93 0.73 ~ 1.04
150mm F2.8 0.09 ~ 0.23 0.19 ~ 0.32 0.28 ~ 0.41 0.37 ~ 0.51 0.47 ~ 0.6 0.56 ~ 0.69 0.65 ~ 0.79
165mm F2.8 0.08 ~ 0.21 0.17 ~ 0.3 0.25 ~ 0.38 0.34 ~ 0.47 0.42 ~ 0.55 0.51 ~ 0.64 0.59 ~ 0.72

Pentax 67 extension tubes offline calculator

Finally, I’ve decided to make a spreadsheet calculator for Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc or similar program. Follow this link to download it. Thanks to the reader who requested this option.

Extension tubes mathematics

If you are interested in learning more about mathematics of extension tubes, read this article by Douglas A. Kerr The Mathematics of Extension Tubes in Photography.

More lenses

Let me know If you would like me to add other lenses to the calculator. I will do it as soon as I possibly can.

// Sasha Krasnov
Super-Multi-Coated TAKUMAR/6X7 90mm F2.8 Leaf Shutter

← Leaf Shutter Lens: Takumar 6X7 90mm F2.8

Pentax 67 lens to Pentax 645 body adapter →

Pentax adapter 645 for 67 lens

13 Comments

  1. Do you have any portrait examples of the 105mm 2.4 while using the helicoid and reverse adapter?

    • Hello Jeff

      I need to browse my archive to find some images. I rarely use ext.tube #1 for closer focusing with 105mm because I do not need greater scale by some reasons but not because “it’s a bad idea”. So, using ext.tube #1 with 105mm and ext.tubes #1 & #2 with 165mm is a common practice. All you need uis exposure compensation about 0.5EV or may be 1EV. I personally do not recommend to use helicoid extension tube – you will lose aperture coupling and it is very uncomfortable during the shooting especially wedding sessions.

      And I’ve never used reverse adapter with helicoid extension tube. This combination is intended for scale 1:2 and greater. So, it gives too close focusing.

      P.S. Moreover, for example, Mamiya RB/RZ 67 use bellows focusing which allows for closer focusing than any other Pentax 67 lenses. And it normal for Mamiya and it is normal for Pentax 67 to add ext.tube #1. I do not see any problem with it.extension.

  2. Sasha, thank you very much for all of the information on the P76 lenses! I’ve found it very helpful when researching which lenses to start with. I’m a portrait photographer getting into medium format now (finally). I already have ordered a 105mm, but I’m trying to figure out which method to use for tighter portraits (face only). Is there an option with extension tube or with reverse adaptor that will allow for a tighter FoV on the 105 lens?

    I’m very familiar with focal lengths and minimum focus distance, but NOT familiar at all with extension tubes and other adapters.

    I thought I could just purchase the 135mm macro, or the 165, etc…. but if there is a solution for the 105mm to get ‘closer’/tighter, and not have to carry another lens — that would be interesting. Although I’m sure I will want to purchase a longer lens for faces, eventually.

    Thanks again! Cheers,

    • Thank you Brian! Considering your question I personally do not recommend to use reverse adapter by some reasons: a) you will need Helicoid Extension Tube at least to make lens focusable; b) also you may need Auto Extension Tube #1 or #2; b) you will loose automatic aperture stop down coupling. Usually Reverse adapter is used for macro work with maginfication ratio 1:1 or greater. If you need to shoot tigther portraits I recommend to use just Auto Extension Tube #1 for 105mm and #2 for 165 lens. It is more convinent and realible way to focus the lenses closer to the subject.

      As for me… I like to use 105mm with Auto Extension Tube #1 in some cases or 135mm Macro. The last one is really underrated lens for portraits but it is very hard to focus it.

  3. I’ve been shooting 4×5 view cameras decided on starting back toward my Old Pentax 6×7 Had these ext. tubes for a long , long time so back to the old basic’s need to be refreshed on so much, From Ditz. to 35mm, now back to the OLD PENTAX 6×7. Thanks for your pages on these Ext. Tubes , never used them from way back then. a new day has arrived , back to new ways.

  4. Need information for lens: 45mm., and 55 mm. using different ext. tube for these two Lens.
    Thank you so much.

  5. Thanks for the technical information. It is rare to find such succinct information that can easily be applied. Shooting 135mm pentax macro with all three rings is tricky- this helps.

  6. Matthew

    Thanks for this! This is very helpful (as was your repair for a sticking mirror/shutter). Do you happen to have an Excel file with the calculator? I’d love to be able to use it without internet access. If not, I’ll just make a rough cheat-sheet for the lenses I have.

  7. Eric Charles Jones

    Thanks Sasha!

    Rare to find such truly useful information these days on the net. I picked up these extension tubes to use with my 105mm F2.4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.