Film developing with D-76

Kodak D-76 is a classic and truly versatile developer. It provides full emulsion speed, long density range and excellent shadow detail with normal contrast and produces fine grain with a variety of continuous-tone black-and-white films.

Kodak D-76 developer to make 3.8 litres (1 gallon)


Kodak recommends to use D-76 as a full-strength stock solution. But there is no reason to use it undiluted. For greater sharpness, but with a slightly increase of grain, a 1+1 dilution is typically used, which is also recommended by Kodak. It gives a long density range and allows push processing with relatively low fog.

If it is diluted to 1+3 it becomes a non-solvent high acutance developer. Non-solvent developers produce a coarser grain structure but the image will look sharper. It is because of there is not a lot of solvent with such dilution to dissolve the edge of the grain.

Fresh solution should be prepared just before developing from certain parts of stock and water. However, I personally recommend to dilute it 1+3 for a better compensating effect. Once Kodak included charts for this dilution. But a few years ago they were removed from its official data.

Pull and push processing

For pull processing up to 2EV I recommend a 1+5 dilution that gives a great compensating effect and lowers contrast. It is very good when a film was shot with high contrast scenes. In my own experience I prefer a 1+1 dilution for push processing up to 2EV or for normal processing with lower contrast scenes. To push it even more I use it undiluted, but do it quite rarely.


The key to stable results is strict compliance with the same rules every time you develop the film. Do not modify temperature and agitation until you get stable results with a certain dilution. If you need more or less film density, first try to increase or decrease developing time. If it doesn’t help, other dilution may be used. But the more diluted the solution gets, the lower the contrast becomes, and vice versa.

By the way, any dilution other than stock can be used only once. This is very convenient. As a result, you always get fresh solution just before developing and you do not need to put the used one back into a separate bottle after the process is over and calculate developing time for the next film, which is absolutely unpredictable. This is another key to stable results.

Development times

The times in this chart are given for the temperature 20°C with no presoaking and the following agitation:

  • 1 inversion of tank or film reel rotation for 2 sec per every 30 sec with dilution 1+1
  • 3 inversions of tank or film reel rotation for 6 sec per every 30 sec with dilution 1+3
  • 5 inversions of tank or film reel rotation for 10 sec per every 30 sec with dilution 1+5

To remove air bubbles from the film I tap the tank a few times immediately after the developer is poured inside. I have been using the sealed Jobo UniTank 1500 tank system for many years.

And, of course, this chart reflects my own experience. Also you may refer to The Massive Dev Chart for other films and times.

ISO/Dilution 1+1 1+3 1+5
Ilford Pan F Plus 50
25 9 15
50 9 15 23
Ilford FP4 Plus 125
64 11 17
125 11 17 23
250 17 23
Kodak TMax 100
50 9 17
100 9 17 23
200 13 23
Fuji Neopan 100 Acros
50 10 17
100 10 17 23
200 17 23
Fomapan 100
50 10 17
100 10 17 23
200 17 23
Kodak TMax 400
400 10 15
800 11 19
1600 19
Kodak Tri-X 400
400 10 19
800 11 27
1600 13
3200 17
Ilford HP5 Plus 400
400 13 20
800 17 25
1600 19
// Sasha Krasnov
6x7 and 6x6 formats example on 120 film type by Sasha Krasnov

← 12 reasons why I still shoot on film

Exposure with extended “Sunny 16 Rule” →

Sunny 16 Rule - ORWO CHROM UT21


  1. David Lyga

    This is rather interesting especially because you are not afraid of stating diminutions up to 1+5 for D-76. ‘Officially’ you are not supposed to do that but, trust me, it does work with consistency. There are many old wives tales with processing. Your data is more real than most.

    I would have preferred that you had stated dilutions as I had) 1+? rather than 1:?. Why? Because in some literature a, for example, 1:3 can mean one part developer MAKES three parts working solution. Ilford’s way, using the ‘+’ instead of the colon, removes any lingering ambiguity.

    • I use the colon as ‘+’. So, the 1:X means — to prepare working solution take one part of stock add X parts of water. But you are right. To avoid misunderstading I will change ‘:’ to ‘+’. Digitaltruth also uses the same symbol too. Thank you, it makes my post better!

Leave a Reply